Fig 1 Representative metallocene complexes with pendant groups.
扫 描 看 全 文
引用本文
阅读全文PDF
A series of C1-symmetric ethylene-bridged ansa-(3-R-cyclopentadienyl)(fluorenyl) metallocene complexes (Zr: 1−5; Hf: 6) have been synthesized, characterized and investigated as catalyst precursors for the high temperature ethylene polymerization. Using methylaluminoxane (MAO) as the cocatalyst, zirconium complexes 1−5 bearing a bulky substituent on the 3-position of the cyclopendienyl ring showed high catalytic activities up to 1.48×107 gPE·molZr−1·h−1 toward the polymerization of ethylene and afforded polyethylenes with high molecular weights (1.49×105−6.31×105 g/mol), meanwhile exhibting great thermal stability at high temperatures up to 120 °C together with a long catalytic life time up to 2 h. By adopting low Al/Zr ratios, such as 125, polyethylenes with ultra high molecular weights up to 2.86×106 g/mol were obtained. It is worthy of noting that zirconium complexes 1−4 bearing a substituent with an aryl pendant showed temperature-dependent activities, which increased rapidly with the increase of polymerization temperature, thus weak interaction of the pendent aryl group with the cationic active center is proposed to account for the very low activities displayed at low temperatures. In contrast to zirconocene complexes 1−5, hafnocene complex 6 only displayed very low catalytic activities toward the polymerization of ethylene and afforded polyethylenes with molecular weights ten times smaller than those obtained by zirconocene complexes 1−5. Zirconocene complexes 1−5 were also able to catalyse the polymerization of propylene at high temperatures, but only afforded waxes with low molecular weights.
Novel ethylene-bridged ansa-(3-R-cyclopentadienyl)(fluorenyl) zirconocene and hafnocene complexes have been synthesized and characterized. Among them zirconocene complexes showed high catalytic activities toward the polymerization of ethylene at high temperatures. By adopting low Al/Zr ratios such as 125, polyethylenes with ultra-high molecular weights up to 2.86×106 g/mol were obtained.
ansa-Metallocene ;
Ethylene;
Propylene;
Polymerization;
High temperature
Over the past decades, numerous efforts have been paid to the research of homogeneous olefin polymerization both academically and industrially since the breakthrough in homogeneous Group 4 metallocene catalysts that exhibit excellent catalytic performance in combination with methylaluminoxane (MAO).[
Not only the ligated five-membered π-systems such as cyclopentadienyl (Cp), indenyl (Ind), fluorenyl (Flu) and their analogues, but also the substituents on them can affect the polymerization characteristics by changing the environment around the metal centre sterically and electronically. In 2001, Hessen’s group[
In contrary to the half-sandwich titanocene complexes with an aryl pendant exhibiting high activities in the trimerization of ethylene, the zirconium and hafnium analogues tended to catalyze ethylene polymerization with low to moderate activities.[
Fig 1 Representative metallocene complexes with pendant groups.
A few examples of pendent groups were introduced into the ansa-metallocene complexes. In 2010, Carpentier and co-workers[
All manipulations were carried out under a dry argon atmosphere using standard Schlenk techniques unless otherwise indicated. Tetrahydrofuran, diethyl ether, n-hexane, petroleum ether and toluene were distilled under argon from sodium-benzophenone prior to use. Dichloromethane was distilled from calcium hydride. Chloroform-d was dried over calcium hydride under argon and stored in the presence of activated 4 Å molecular sieves. n-BuLi (2.4 mol/L in n-hexane) was purchased from Acros Organics. 9-(2-Bromoethyl)-fluorene,[
Synthesis of zirconocene complex 1
To a mixture of bromobenzene (12.0 mL, 114 mmol) and petroleum ether (30 mL) cooled to 0 °C, was added dropwise a solution of n-BuLi in n-hexane (54.0 mL, 2.30 mol/L, 124 mmol). The reaction mixture was then warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight. White precipitates separated out gradually. After filtration, the solid residue was washed with 10 mL of petroleum ether and dried under vacuum. The obtained white solids were dissolved in 30 mL of tetrahydrofuran and the solution was titrated with standard hydrochloric acid (yield 68.5%). The obtained solution was cooled to 0 °C, then a solution of 6,6-dimethylfulvene (8.31 g, 78.0 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (20 mL) was added dropwise. The resultant orange solution was stirred overnight and then hydrolysed with 50 mL of aqueous ammonium chloride. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether) to afford Cp1 as a pale-yellow oil (10.10 g, 70.0%). The product was a mixture of two isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.36−7.27 (m, 4H, Ph- H), 7.24−7.18 (m, 1H, Ph- H), 6.50−6.16 (m, 3H, Cp-C H), 3.09−2.78 (two singlets, 2H, Cp-C H2), 1.63−1.58 (two singlets, 6H, ―C H3).
To a solution of Cp1 (2.78 g, 15.0 mmol) in 30 mL of tetrahydrofuran at −78 °C was added dropwise a solution of n-BuLi in n-hexane (6.1 mL, 2.30 mol/L, 15 mmol). The solution was stirred at room temperature overnight and then added via cannula to a solution of 9-(2-bromoethyl)-fluorene (3.82 g, 15.0 mmol) in 20 mL of tetrahydrofuran. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and then hydrolysed with 50 mL of aqueous ammonium chloride. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether. The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether) to afford L1H2 as a pale-yellow oil (1.67 g, 28.4%), which was used directly in the next step without further purification. The product was a mixture of several isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.83−7.62 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.56−7.43 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.33−7.04 (m, 9H, Ph- H, Flu- H), 6.09−5.62 (m, 2H, Cp-C H), 4.01−3.86 (m, 1H, Cp-C H), 2.87−2.44 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2), 2.23−1.94 (m, 4H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 1.56−1.43 (m, 6H, ―C H3).
To a solution of L1H2 (1.52 g, 3.9 mmol) in 30 mL of Et2O at 0 °C was added dropwise a solution of n-BuLi in n-hexane (4.9 mL, 1.60 mol/L, 7.8 mmol). The resulting suspension was stirred for 48 h at room temperature. ZrCl4 (0.91 g, 3.9 mmol) was added to the suspension as solid. The resultant orange mixture was stirred for 48 h at room temperature, and the solvents were removed under vacuum. The residue was dissolved with 30 mL of CH2Cl2. After filtration, the solution was concentrated and stored at −20 °C to give 1 as orange crystalline solids (0.32 g, 16%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 8.03 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 8.02 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.71 (dt, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.65 (dt, 3J=8.5 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.62 (td, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.59 (td,3J=8.5 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.45−7.39 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.22−7.18 (m, 2H, Ph- H), 7.13−7.09 (m, 1H, Ph- H), 7.05−7.03 (m, 2H, Ph- H), 6.19 (t, 3J=3.0 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.08 (t, 3J=2.6 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.05 (t, 3J=2.6 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.30 (s, 0.17 × 2H, 0.17 C H2Cl2), 4.01−3.88 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.81−3.72 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.58−3.50 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 1.65 (s, 3H, ―C H3), 1.57 (s, 3H, ―C H3), 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 150.4, 140.1, 133.7, 127.9, 127.5, 126.9, 124.89, 124.85, 124.7, 124.6, 124.5, 123.9, 123.74, 123.70, 120.3, 119.9, 119.3, 110.3, 106.1, 101.9, 39.4, 30.5, 27.2, 26.9, 26.3. Anal. Calcd. for C29H26ZrCl2·0.17 CH2Cl2: C, 63.58; H, 4.82; found: C, 63.00; H, 5.05%.
Synthesis of zirconocene complex 2
A similar method described for Cp1 was adopted, except that 4-methylbromobenzene (8.00 g, 47.0 mmol), n-butyllithium (19.5 mL, 2.30 mol/L in n-hexane, 47.0 mmol), 6,6-dimethylfulvene (3.52 g, 33.0 mmol) were used. Cp2 was obtained as a pale-yellow oil (6.51 g, 69.0%). The product was a mixture of two isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.22−7.05 (m, 4H, Ph- H), 6.48−6.14 (m, 3H, Cp-C H), 3.06−2.78 (two singlets, 2H, Cp-C H2), 2.33−2.31 (two singlets, 3H, Ar-C H3), 1.62−1.50 (two singlets, 6H, ―C H3).
To a solution of Cp2 (3.00 g, 15.0 mmol) in 30 mL of tetrahydrofuran at −78 °C were added dropwise a solution of n-BuLi in n-hexane (6.1 mL, 2.30 mol/L, 15 mmol) and hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA, 5 mL). The mixture was stirred at room temperature overnight and then added via cannula to a solution of 9-(2-bromoethyl)-fluorene (3.82 g, 15.0 mmol) in 20 mL of tetrahydrofuran. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and then hydrolysed with 50 mL of aqueous ammonium chloride. The organic phase was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with diethyl ether. The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether) to afford L2H2 as a pale-yellow oil (0.96 g, 16.4%), which was used directly in the next step without further purification. The product was a mixture of several isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.79−7.71 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.60−7.47 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.41−7.25 (m, 4H, Ph- H, Flu- H), 7.23−7.05 (m, 4H, Ph- H, Flu- H), 6.14−5.77 (m, 2H, Cp-C H), 4.15−3.92 (m, 1H, Cp-C H), 2.89−2.56 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2), 2.50−2.04 (m, 7H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful, Ar-C H3), 1.52−1.39 (m, 6H, ―C H3).
A similar method described for complex 1 was adopted, except that L2H2 (0.66 g, 1.2 mmol), n-BuLi (1.0 mL, 1.60 mol/L in n-hexane, 2.4 mmol), ZrCl4 (0.28 g, 1.2 mmol) were used.Complex 2 was isolated as orange crystalline solids (0.28 g, 41%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 8.03 (dt, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 8.02 (dt, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.70 (dt, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.65 (dt, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.61 (td, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.58 (td, 3J=8.5 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.44−7.35 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 6.96 (d, 3J=8.2 Hz, 2H, Ph- H), 6.83 (d, 3J=8.2 Hz, 2H, Ph- H), 6.18 (t, 3J=3.0 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.05(t, 3J=2.6 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.03 (t, 3J=2.8 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.30 (s, 0.15 × 2H, 0.15 C H2Cl2), 4.03−3.82 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.83−3.70 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.62−3.54 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 2.26 (s, 3H, Ar-C H3), 1.57 (s, 3H, ―C H3), 1.52 (s, 3H, ―C H3). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 147.6, 140.5, 134.0, 133.7, 127.8, 127.6, 127.5, 124.9, 124.7, 124.5, 124.4, 123.9, 123.75, 123.71, 122.6, 120.2, 119.9, 119.1, 110.2, 106.2, 101.8, 39.1, 30.5, 27.2, 26.8, 26.4, 19.8. Anal. Calcd. for C30H28ZrCl2·0.15 CH2Cl2: C, 64.27; H, 5.06; found: C, 63.91; H, 5.27%.
Synthesis of zirconocene complex 3
A similar method described for Cp1 was adopted, except that 3,5-dimethylbromobenzene (6.80 g, 37.0 mmol), n-BuLi (15.7 mL, 2.30 mol/L in n-hexane, 37.0 mmol), 6,6-dimethylfulvene (2.65 g, 25.0 mmol) were used. Cp3 was obtained as a pale-yellow oil (3.85g, 72.0%). The product was a mixture of several isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 6.92−6.78 (m, 3H, Ph- H), 6.48−6.14 (m, 3H, Cp-C H), 3.02−2.75 (two singlets, 2H, Cp-C H2), 2.3−2.26 (two singlets, 6H, Ar-C H3), 1.60−1.53 (two singlets, 6H, ―C H3).
A similar method described for L2H2 was adopted, except that Cp3 (3.80 g, 17.9 mmol), n-butyllithium (7.8 mL, 2.30 mol/L in n-hexane, 18.0 mmol), HMPA (5 mL), 9-(2-bromoethyl)-fluorene (3.92 g, 14.3 mmol) were used. L3H2 was obtained as a pale yellow oil (3.27 g, 56.6%). The product was a mixture of several isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.81−7.66 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.62−7.48 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.40−7.28 (m, 4H, Flu- H), 6.95−6.78 (m, 3H, Ph- H), 6.20−5.78 (m, 2H, Cp-C H), 4.10−3.95 (m, 1H, Ful- H), 2.95−2.57 (m, 2H, Cp-C H), 2. 52−2.09 (m, 10H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful, Ar-C H3), 1.52−1.39 (m, 6H, ―C H3).
A similar method described for complex 1 was adopted, except that L3H2 (1.68 g, 4.2 mmol), n-BuLi (5.2 mL, 1.60 mol/L in n-hexane, 8.4 mmol), ZrCl4 (0.97 g, 4.2 mmol) were used. Complex 3 was isolated as orange crystalline solids (0.40 g, 17%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 8.03 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 8.02 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.71 (dt, 3J=8.6 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.65 (dt, 3J=8.6 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.61 (td,3J=8.6 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.58 (td, 3J=8.6 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.44−7.35 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 6.73 (s, 1H, Ph- H), 6.63 (s, 2H, Ph- H), 6.18 (t, 3J=3.0 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.06 (t, 3J=2.6 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.03 (t, 3J=2.6 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.30 (s, 0.16 × 2H, 0.16 C H2Cl2), 3.97−3.88 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.83−3.71 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.57−3.50 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 2.24 (s, 6H, Ar-C H3), 1.58 (s, 3H, ―C H3), 1.52 (s, 3H, ―C H3). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 151.5, 141.5, 137.2, 134.6, 128.8, 128.5, 127.2, 125.9, 125.7, 125.5, 124.9, 124.7, 123.6, 123.4, 121.3, 120.9, 120.2, 111.3, 107.2, 102.8, 40.2, 31.6, 28.2, 27.7, 27.4, 21.5. Anal. Calcd. for C31H30ZrCl2·0.16 CH2Cl2: C, 64.72; H, 5.28; found: C, 64.23; H, 5.43%.
Synthesis of zirconocene complex 4
Under the protection of argon, a tetrahydrofuran (50 mL) solution of benzyl bromide (26.0 g, 152 mmol) was added slowly to a 100 mL three-neck flask loaded with dried magnesium strips (4.00 g, 167 mmol). After addition, the reaction mixture was heated to reflux overnight. The unreacted magnesium strips in the reaction mixture were removed by filtration; 1 mL of the filtrate was subjected to hydrolysis and titrated with a standard hydrochloric acid solution. 50 mL of the filtrate (1.20 mol/L, 61.0 mmol) was added to a solution of 6,6-dimethylfulvene (6.44 g, 61.0 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran. The resultant orange solution was stirred overnight and then hydrolysed with 50 mL of aqueous ammonium chloride. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether) to afford Cp4 as a pale-yellow oil (3.15 g, 47.50%). The product was a mixture of several isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.37−7.23 (m, 5H, Ph- H), 6.49−5.87 (m, 3H, Cp-C H), 2.87−2.81 (m, 4H, Cp-C H2, ―C H2-Ph), 1.26−1.23 (two singlets, 6H, ―C H3).
A similar method described for L2H2 was adopted, except that Cp4 (2.80 g, 14.2 mmol), n-BuLi (5.6 mL, 2.30 mol/L in n-hexane, 14.0 mmol), hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA, 5 mL), 9-(2-bromoethyl)-fluorene (3.85 g, 14.2 mmol) were used. L4H2 was obtained as a pale-yellow oil (1.81 g, 32.6%). The product was a mixture of several isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.80−7.77 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.59−7.54 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.42−7.31 (m, 4H, Flu- H), 7.20−7.13 (m, 3H, Ph- H), 6.98−6.93 (m, 2H, Ph- H), 6.26−5.61 (m, 2H, Cp-C H), 4.10−4.04 (m, 1H, Ful- H), 2.89−2.62 (m, 4H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 2.42−2.16 (m, 4H, ―C H2-Ph, Cp- H), 1.12−1.10 (m, 6H, ―C H3).
A similar method described for complex 1 was adopted, except that L4H2 (0.85 g, 2.2 mmol), n-BuLi (2.7 mL, 1.60 mol/L in n-hexane, 4.4 mmol), ZrCl4 (0.51 g, 2.2 mmol) were used. Complex 4 was isolated as orange crystalline solids (0.30 g, 27%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 8.00 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 2H, Flu- H), 7.67 (d, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.64 (dt, 3J=8.6 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu-H), 7.58 (td, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 2H, Flu-H), 7.41−7.33 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.16−7.10 (m, 3H, Ph- H), 6.74−6.68 (m, 2H, Ph- H), 6.16 (t, 3J=3.0 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.03 (t, 3J=2.8 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.69 (t, 3J=2.6 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.30 (s, 0.09 × 2H, 0.09 C H2Cl2), 3.95−3.87 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.78−3.71 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.66−3.58 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.53−3.46 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 2.63 (d, 2J=12.8 Hz, 1H, -C H2-Ph), 2.54 (d, 2J=12.8 Hz, 1H, -C H2-Ph), 1.20 (s, 3H, ―C H3), 1.10 (s, 3H, ―C H3). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 142.1, 138.2, 135.3, 130.7, 128.8, 128.5, 127.3, 126.0, 125.8, 125.77, 125.74, 125.5, 124.9, 124.8, 124.7, 123.6, 121.1, 121.0, 118.4, 110.2, 107.5, 102.7, 52.6, 37.8, 31.3, 28.4, 27.0, 25.0. Anal. Calcd. for C30H28ZrCl2·0.09 CH2Cl2: C, 64.73; H, 5.09; found: C, 64.23; H, 5.52%.
Synthesis of zirconocene complex 5
Under the protection of argon, a solution of n-BuLi in n-hexane (2.5 mol/L, 15.8 mL, 40.0 mmol) was added dropwise to a solution of 6,6-dimethylfulvene (4.20 g, 40.0 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran. The resultant orange solution was stirred overnight and then hydrolysed with 50 mL of aqueous ammonium chloride. The organic phase was separated and the aqueous layer was extracted with Et2O. The combined organic phases were dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and evaporated. The residue was purified by column chromatography (eluent: petroleum ether) to afford Cp5 as a pale-yellow oil (2.40 g, 36.9%). The product was a mixture of two isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 6.49−5.87 (m, 3H, Cp-C H), 2.87−2.81 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2), 1. 38−1.29 (m, 2H, Bu-C H2), 1.18−1.14 (m, 2H, Bu-C H2), 1.04−0.98 (m, 8H, ―C H3, Bu-C H2). 0.80−0.76 (m, 3H, Bu-C H3).
A similar method described for L2H2, was adopted, except that Cp5 (2.10 g, 12.8 mmol), n-BuLi (5.1 mL, 2.30 mol/L in n-hexane, 13.0 mmol), HMPA (5 mL), 9-(2-bromoethyl)-fluorene (3.50 g, 12.8 mmol) were used. L5H2 was obtained as a pale-yellow oil (1.63 g, 35.8%). The product was a mixture of several isomers. 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 7.78−7.73 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.59−7.52 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.38−7.28 (m, 4H, Flu- H), 6.26−5.61 (m, 2H, Cp-C H), 4.10−4.04 (m, 1H, Ful- H), 2.81−2.70 (m, 2H, Cp-C H), 2.36−2.12 (m, 4H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 1.39−1.31 (m, 2H, Bu-C H2), 1.26−1.18 (m, 2H, Bu-C H2), 1.08−1.04 (m, 8H, ―C H3, Bu-C H2). 0.89−0.82 (m, 3H, Bu-C H3).
A similar method described for complex 1 was adopted, except that L5H2 (0.86 g, 2.4 mmol), n-BuLi (3.0 mL, 1.60 mol/L in n-hexane, 4.8 mmol), ZrCl4 (0.56 g, 2.4 mmol) were used. Complex 5 was isolated as orange crystalline solids (0.36 g, 29%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 8.00 (ddd,3J=8.5 Hz, 4J =1.1 Hz, 5J=0.8 Hz, 2H, Flu- H), 7.68 (td, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J=1.1 Hz, 2H, Flu- H), 7.61−7.55 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.38 (td, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J=1.1 Hz, 2H, Flu- H), 6.17 (t, 3J=3.0 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 6.06 (t, 3J=2.8 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.88 (t, 3J=2.6 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.30 (s, 0.15 × 2H, 0.15 C H2Cl2), 3.97−3.89 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.79−3.65 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.54−3.47 (m, 1H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 1.29−1.23 (m, 2H, ―C H2―), 1.14−1.08 (m, 8H, ―C H3, ―C H2―), 1.05−0.94 (m, 1H, ―C H2―) 0.75−0.79 (m, 4H, ―C H2―, ―C H3). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 142.2, 133.8, 127.7, 127.4, 124.8, 124.7, 124.65, 123.8, 123.7, 123.6, 122.6, 120.2, 120.0, 117.3, 109.5, 106.2, 101.7, 45.8, 35.2, 30.4, 27.3, 26.3, 25.5, 23.7, 22.1, 13.0. Anal. Calcd. for C27H30ZrCl2·0.15 CH2Cl2: C, 61.60; H, 5.77; found: C, 61.07; H, 5.81%.
Synthesis of hafnocene complex 6
A similar method described for complex 1 was adopted, except that L1H2 (1.10 g, 2.9 mmol), n-BuLi (3.7 mL, 1.60 mol/L in n-hexane, 5.9 mmol), HfCl4 (0.94 g, 2.9 mmol) were used. Complex 6 was isolated as yellow solids (0.45 g, 25%). 1H-NMR (400 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 8.02 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 8.01 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.67 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu-H), 7.63 (dt, 3J=8.4 Hz, 4J≈5J≈0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.58 (td, 3J=8.6 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.54 (td, 3J=8.6 Hz, 4J=0.8 Hz, 1H, Flu- H), 7.39−7.31 (m, 2H, Flu- H), 7.20−7.14 (m, 2H, Ph- H), 7.11−7.05 (m, 1H, Ph- H), 7.02−6.98 (m, 2H, Ph- H), 6.06 (t, 3J=3.0 Hz, 1H, Cp- H), 5.96 (d, 3J=3.0 Hz, 2H, Cp- H), 5.30 (s, 0.03 × 2H, 0.03 C H2Cl2), 3.87−3.83 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 3.69−3.53 (m, 2H, Cp-C H2C H2-Ful), 1.55 (s, 3H, ―C H3), 1.46 (s, 3H, ―C H3). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, 25 °C, CDCl3, δ, ppm): 151.7, 139.5, 133.0, 128.6, 128.3, 128.0, 125.64, 125.60, 125.5, 125.4, 125.20, 125.18, 124.8, 124.7, 123.8, 122.7, 121.0, 120.8, 118.7, 109.5, 105.6, 98.5, 40.4, 31.0, 27.9, 27.7, 27.3. Anal. Calcd. for C29H26HfCl2·0.03 CH2Cl2: C, 55.66; H, 4.19; found: C, 55.51; H, 4.29%.
Ethylene polymerization was carried out in a 100 mL autoclave equipped with a mechanical stirrer. The autoclave was heated at 100 °C under vacuum for 30 min and then thermos-stated to the desired temperature and filled with ethylene. An appropriate amount of MAO solution and toluene were added to the autoclave and the solution was stirred under ethylene atmosphere for 15 min. After an appropriate amount of toluene solution of the catalyst was injected into the reactor, ethylene at the desired pressure was introduced to start the polymerization. The reaction mixture was stirred vigorously for a desired time and then the ethylene pressure in the autoclave was slowly vented. 10 mL of ethanol was added to terminate the polymerization. The resulting mixture was poured into 3% HCl in ethanol (50 mL). The polymer was collected by filtration, washed with ethanol (30 mL × 2), and then dried for 16 h in a vacuum oven at 60 °C to constant weight.
Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies for complexes 2, 4 and 6 were carried out on a Bruker AXSD8 diffractometer with graphite monochromated Mo-Kα radiation (λ=0.71073 Å). All data were collected at −133 °C (2) and −143 °C (4 and 6) using the ω-scan technique. Unit cell dimensions were obtained with least-squares refinements. Intensities were corrected for Lorentz and polarization effects and empirical absorption. The structures were solved by direct methods and refined by full-matrix least square on F2. All the calculations were carried out with the SHELXTL program. All non-hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically, and the hydrogen atoms were included in idealized position.
As illustrated in
Fig 1 Synthetic routes to metallocene complexes 1−6.
Single crystals of zirconocene complexes 2, 4 and hafnocene complex 6 suitable for X-ray diffraction analysis were obtained at −20 °C from their saturated CH 2Cl2 solutions. All the complexes are composed of a pair of enantiomers. Their molecular structures are shown in
Fig 1 ORTEP view of the molecular structure of zirconocene complex 2 (Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity); Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Zr–Cl1, 2.449(5); Zr–Cl2, 2.427(8); Zr–C1, 2.544(7); Zr–C6, 2.669(7); Zr–C7, 2.690(0); Zr–C12, 2.549(7); Zr–C13, 2.435(2); Zr–C16, 2.494(8); Zr–C17, 2.475(9); Zr–C18, 2.525(0); Zr–C19, 2.601(7); Zr–C20, 2.510(9); Cl1–Zr–Cl2, 93.52(5).
Fig 2 ORTEP view of the molecular structure of zirconocene complex 4 (Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity); Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Zr–Cl1, 2.436(0); Zr–Cl2, 2.427(1); Zr–C1, 2.558(1); Zr–C6, 2.720(4); Zr–C7, 2.709(4); Zr–C12, 2.555(7); Zr–C13, 2.434(6); Zr–C16, 2.501(2); Zr–C17, 2.471(6); Zr–C18, 2.512(0); Zr–C19, 2.590(3); Zr–C20, 2.516(7); Cl1–Zr–Cl2, 96.22(2).
Fig 3 ORTEP view of the molecular structure of hafnocene complex 6 (Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level with hydrogen atoms omitted for clarity); Selected bond lengths (Å) and angles (°): Zr–Cl1, 2.392(4); Zr–Cl2, 2.398(1); Zr–C1, 2.563(7); Zr–C6, 2.733(8); Zr–C7, 2.720(8); Zr–C12, 2.528(8); Zr–C13, 2.425(7); Zr–C16, 2.491(7); Zr–C17, 2.520(7); Zr–C18, 2.557(8); Zr–C19, 2.499(8); Zr–C20, 2.445(7); Cl1–Zr–Cl2, 97.07(7).
The solid-state molecular structures of 2, 4 and 6 exhibit essentially similar geometrical parameters. Correspondingly, the metal-CentCp and metal-CentFlu distances, α and β angles are almost identical in these molecules. However, by comparing the data listed in
| ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Complex | α (°) | β (°) | M-CentCp (Å) | M-CentFul (Å) |
2 | 62.14 | 126.38 | 2.213 | 2.271 |
4 | 62.98 | 126.33 | 2.211 | 2.291 |
6 | 62.70 | 128.00 | 2.191 | 2.289 |
The catalytic behavior of metallocene complexes 1−6 toward the ethylene polymerization were evaluated at different temperatures using MAO as the cocatalyst. The polymerization results are summarized in
Run | Cat. | Tp (°C) | Al/M | Yield (g) | Activity (106 g·mol·M−1·h−1) | Mηb(105 g/mol) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | 40 | 2000 | 0.51 | 1.02 | 6.02 |
2 | 60 | 2000 | 1.32 | 2.64 | 4.29 | |
3 | 80 | 2000 | 2.71 | 5.42 | 3.54 | |
4 | 100 | 2000 | 3.62 | 7.24 | 2.86 | |
5 | 120 | 2000 | 6.41 | 12.8 | 2.09 | |
6 | 120 c | 2000 | 4.32 | 8.64 | 4.03 | |
7 | 140 c | 2000 | 2.16 | 4.32 | 2.69 | |
8 | 2 | 40 | 2000 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 6.13d |
9 | 60 | 2000 | 1.05 | 2.10 | 4.42 | |
10 | 80 | 2000 | 2.35 | 4.70 | 3.54 | |
11 | 100 | 2000 | 3.11 | 6.22 | 2.91 | |
12 | 120 | 2000 | 5.46 | 10.9 | 2.14 | |
13 | 3 | 40 | 2000 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 6.31 |
14 | 60 | 2000 | 0.95 | 1.90 | 4.56 | |
15 | 80 | 2000 | 2.10 | 4.20 | 3.73 | |
16 | 100 | 2000 | 3.35 | 6.70 | 2.85 | |
17 | 120 | 2000 | 5.03 | 10.1 | 2.12d | |
18 | 4 | 40 | 2000 | 1.21 | 2.42 | 5.83 |
19 | 60 | 2000 | 1.82 | 3.64 | 4.18 | |
20 | 80 | 2000 | 3.34 | 6.68 | 3.47 | |
21 | 100 | 2000 | 4.16 | 8.32 | 2.54 | |
22 | 120 | 2000 | 7.05 | 14.1 | 1.63 | |
23 | 5 | 40 | 2000 | 6.37 | 12.7 | 5.67 |
24 | 60 | 2000 | 6.72 | 13.4 | 4.08 | |
25 | 80 | 2000 | 7.40 | 14.8 | 3.42 | |
26 | 100 | 2000 | 7.03 | 14.1 | 2.76 | |
27 | 120 | 2000 | 6.52 | 13.0 | 1.49 | |
28 | 6 | 40 | 2000 | 0.45 | 0.90 | 0.67 |
29 | 60 | 2000 | 0.52 | 1.04 | 0.58 | |
30 | 80 | 2000 | 0.78 | 1.56 | 0.32 | |
31 | 100 | 2000 | 1.32 | 2.64 | 0.16 | |
32 | 120 | 2000 | 0.84 | 1.68 | 0.09 |
a Conditions: in toluene, V=100 mL, [Cat.]=0.01 mmol/L, Pethylene=1 MPa, t=30 min;b Intrinsic viscosity was determined in decahydronaphthalene at 135 °C using Ubbelohde calibrated viscometer technique and viscosity average molecular weight was calculated using the relation: [η]=6.67×10−4Mη0.67; c In xylene; d Run 8: Mw=1.4×106 g/mol, Mw/Mn=3.1; Run 17: Mw=3.8×105 g/mol, Mw/Mn=5.6, Mw and Mw/Mn were determined by GPC, using 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene as solvent at 160 °C.
For an easier understanding on the influence of polymerization temperature on the catalytic activities of these metallocene complexes, their activity data at different temperatures were further illustrated in
Fig 4 Influence of polymerization temperature on the catalytic activities of complexes 1−6/MAO toward ethylene polymerization (Conditions: [Cat.]=0.01 mmol/L, Al/M=2000, Pethylene=1 MPa, t=30 min, V=100 mL).
By comparing the activities of complexes 1−4, a reversed order is generally found with the increase of the steric bulkiness of the pendent aryl group, that is 4 (Bn) > 1 (Ph) > 2 (4-MePh) ≥ 3 (3,5-Me2Ph). Among them, complex 4 having a pendent benzyl group displayed the highest activities in the whole investigated temperature range. It seems that the elongation of one additional methylene unit between the pendent phenyl ring and the quaternary carbon bridge in complex 4 tends to bring less hindrance to the active metal centre either via weakening the coordination interaction or by introducing more flexibility of the pendent group, thus leading to higher catalytic activities.
As shown in
From
To further study the thermal stability of this series of zirconocene complexes, complex 1 was chosen to polymerize ethylene in xylene at higher temperatures. Under the same conditions, complex 1 showed a lower catalytic activity in xylene than in toluene, but polyethylene with a higher molecular weight was obtained (runs 5 and 6 at 120 °C). Further increasing the temperature to 140 °C caused a decrease of the catalytic activity, which may be attributed to the partial decomposition of the active species or the poor solubility of ethylene in xylene at a higher temperature. Nevertheless, these data provide a solid support to the good thermal stability of this series of zirconocene complexes.
In addition to temperature, the influences of other factors, such as the molar ratio of Al/Zr, polymerization time and ethylene pressure were also studied by using complex 1 as the catalyst, and the results are summarized in
Run | Al/Zr | Tp(°C) | Time (min) | Pressure (MPa) | Yield (g) | Activity (107 g·molZr−1·h−1) | Mη b(105 g/mol) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 125 | 120 | 30 | 1.0 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 28.6 |
2 | 250 | 120 | 30 | 1.0 | 1.05 | 0.21 | 19.3 |
3 | 500 | 120 | 30 | 1.0 | 2.65 | 0.53 | 6.42 |
4 | 1000 | 120 | 30 | 1.0 | 5.10 | 1.02 | 3.41 |
5 | 2000 | 120 | 30 | 1.0 | 6.41 | 1.28 | 2.09 |
6 | 4000 | 120 | 30 | 1.0 | 7.82 | 1.56 | 1.82 |
7 | 2000 | 120 | 15 | 1.0 | 2.31 | 0.92 | 1.28 |
8 | 2000 | 120 | 60 | 1.0 | 9.62 | 0.96 | 2.42 |
9 | 2000 | 120 | 120 | 1.0 | 10.34 | 0.52 | 2.67 |
10 | 2000 | 120 | 30 | 0.2 | 3.06 | 0.61 | 1.28 |
11 | 2000 | 120 | 30 | 0.4 | 3.69 | 0.74 | 1.32 |
12 | 2000 | 120 | 30 | 0.6 | 4.16 | 0.83 | 1.46 |
13 | 2000 | 120 | 30 | 0.8 | 5.01 | 1.02 | 1.82 |
a Conditions: in toluene, V=100 mL, [Cat.]=0.01 μmol/mL; b Intrinsic viscosity was determined in decahydronaphthalene at 135 °C by Ubbelohde calibrated viscometer technique and viscosity average molecular weight was calculated using the relation: [η] = 6.67×10−4Mη0.67.
The variation of the Al/Zr molar ratio had a significant influence on the catalytic activity and the molecular weight of the resultant polyethylene. As the Al/Zr molar ratio increased from 125 to 4000, the catalytic activity rapidly increased from 0.10×107 g·molZr−1·h−1 to 1.56×107 g·molZr−1·h−1. Meanwhile, the Mη value of the resultant polyethylene decreased when the Al/Zr molar ratio increased, due to the enhanced chain transfer to aluminium for the termination. It is worthy of noting, polyethylene with an ultra-high molecular weight of Mη=2.86×106 g/mol was obtained by adopting a very low Al/Zr molar ratio of 125, meanwhile the catalytic activity of the catalyst was still maintained at a moderately high value of 1.00×106 g·molZr−1·h−1.
Complex 1 was then conducted to polymerize ethylene within different time. With the increase of polymerization time from 15 min to 30 min, we found that not only the amount of polymeric product increased gradually, at the same time, a significant increase of the catalytic activity was also observed. We consider that due to the presence of a pendent aryl group on the 3-position of the cyclopentadienyl moiety, the activation of the metal centre might be somewhat hindered, resulting in a higher activation energy and thus slower activation of the catalyst. At the beginning of the reaction, the relatively lower concentration of active sites would lead to a lower catalytic activity; with the progress of the polymerization process, the catalyst should be extensively activated and thus showed an enhanced catalytic activity.
As shown in
Besides, the ethylene pressure showed a positive influence on the catalytic activity and the molecular weight of the resultant polyethylene. When the ethylene pressure was increased, both the catalytic activity and the molecular weight increased consistently.
13C-NMR analysis of a typical polymer sample (Fig. S13 in the electronic supplementary information, ESI,
In our previous studies, ethylene-bridged ansa-(indenyl) (fluorenyl) zirconocene complexes[
In summary, a series of ethylene-bridged ansa-(3-R- cyclopentadienyl)(fluorenyl) zirconocene and hafnocene complexes bearing a bulky substituent with a pendent aryl or alkyl group on the cyclopentadienyl ring were synthesized. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies on zirconocene complexes 2, 4 and hafnocene complex 6 reveal their similar molecular structures in the solid state and slight flip of the coordination mode of the fluorenyl from η5 to η3. In the presence of MAO, zirconocene complexes 1−4 bearing a pendent aryl group showed much higher catalytic activities toward ethylene polymerization at 120 °C when compared with those of the polymerization runs carried at lower temperatures. In contrast, zirconocene complex 5 nearly displayed constant activities within the studied temperature range. The surge of activity observed for complex 1−4 with the increase of polymerization temperature is suggested to be attributed to the pendent aryl group on the 3-position of the cyclopentadienyl ring, which might interact with the metal centre and thus hinder the coordination/insertion of ethylene monomer at low temperatures. All zirconocene complexes 1−5 showed high catalytic activities and great thermal stability at high temperatures up to 120 °C toward the polymerization of ethylene, affording polyethylenes with high molecular weights. A long catalytic life time up to 2 h was also evidenced by using typical complex 1 in combination with MAO. By adopting low Al/Zr ratios, polyethylenes with ultra-high molecular weights were obtained. The nature of metal centre exhibits crucial influence, and in comparison with zirconocene complexes 1−5, complex 6 only displayed very low catalytic activities toward the polymerization of ethylene and afforded polyethylenes with molecular weights ten times smaller than those obtained by 1−5. Moreover, zirconocene complexes 1−5 were also able to catalyse the polymerization of propylene at high temperatures, but only afforded waxes with low molecular weights.
Alt,H.G.;Köppl,A.EffectofthenatureofmetallocenecomplexesofgroupIVmetalsontheirperformanceincatalyticethyleneandpropylenepolymerization.Chem. Rev.2000,100,1205−1221.. [百度学术]
Chen,E.Y.X.;Mark,T.J.Cocatalystsformetal-catalyzedolefinpolymerization: activators,activationprocesses,andstructure-activityrelationships.Chem. Rev.2000,100,1391−1434.. [百度学术]
Angermund,K.;Fink,G.;Jensen,V.R.;Kleinschmidt,R.Towardquantitativepredictionofstereospecificityofmetallocene-basedcatalystsforα-olefinpolymerization.Chem. Rev.2000,100,1457−1470.. [百度学术]
Janiak,C.Metalloceneandrelatedcatalystsforolefin,alkyneandsilanedimerizationandoligomerization.Coord. Chem. Rev.2006,250,66−94.. [百度学术]
Alt,H.G.;Samuel,E.Fluorenylcomplexesofzirconiumandhafniumascatalystsforolefinpolymerization.Chem. Soc. Rev.1998,27,323−329.. [百度学术]
Decker,P.J.W.;Hessen,B.;Teuben,J.H.Switchingacatalystsystemfromethenepolymerizationtoethenetrimerizationwithahemilabileancillaryligand.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.2001,40,2516−2519.. [百度学术]
Huang,J.;Wu,T.;Qian,Y.Ethylenetrimerizationwithahalf-sandwichtitaniumcomplexbearingapendantthienylgroup.Chem. Commun.2003,22,2816−2817.. [百度学术]
Zhang,Y.;Ma,H.;Huang,J.Highlyselectiveethylenetrimerizationcatalyzedbyhalf-sandwichindenyltitaniumcomplexeswithpendantarenegroupsandMAO.J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.2013,373,85−95.. [百度学术]
Decker,P.J.W.;Hessen,B.;Teuben,J.H.Catalytictrimerizationofethenewithhighlyactivecyclopentadienyl-arenetitaniumcatalysts.Organometallics2002,21,5122−5135.. [百度学术]
Hessen,B.Monocyclopentadienyltitaniumcatalysts:ethenepolymerisationversusethenetrimerisation.J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.2004,213,129−135.. [百度学术]
Wang,C.;Huang,J.Styrenepolymerizationwithhalf-sandwichtitaniumcomplexesbearingpendentcyclo-alkenylgroups.Eur. Polym. J.2006,42,3032−3040.. [百度学术]
Pinheiro,A.C.;Virgili,A.H.;Roisnel,T.;Kirillov,E.;Carpentier,J.-F;Casagrande,Jr.O.L.Ni(II)complexesbearingpyrrolide-imineligandswithpendantN-,O-andS-donorgroups:synthesis,structuralcharacterizationanduseinethyleneoligomerization.RSC Adv.2015,5,91524−91531.. [百度学术]
Boudier,A.;Breuil,P.-A.R.;Megna,L.;Olivier-Bourbigou,H.Nickel(II)complexeswithimino-imidazolechelatingligandsbearingpendantdonorgroups(SR,OR,NR2,PR2)asprecatalystsinethyleneoligomerization.J. Organomet. Chem.2012,718,31−37.. [百度学术]
Ulbrich,A.H.D.P.S.;Bergamo,A.L.;Casagrande,Jr.O.L.Oligomerizationofethyleneusingtridentatenickelcatalystsbearingether-pyrazolligandswithpendantO-andS-donorgroups.Catal. Commun.2011,16,245−249.. [百度学术]
Song,K.;Gao,H.;Liu,F.;Pan,J.;Guo,L.;Zai,S.;Wu,Q.Syntheses,structures,andcatalyticethyleneoligomerizationbehaviorsofbis(phosphanyl)aminenickel(II)complexescontainingN-functionalizedpendantgroups.Eur. Inorg. Chem.2009,20,3016−3024.. [百度学术]
Bahuleyan,B.K.;Ahn,I.Y.;Appukuttan,V.;Lee,S.H.;Ha,C.;Kim,I.Ethyleneoligomerizationbytridentatecobaltcomplexesbearingpendantdonormodifiedα-diimineligands.Macromol. Res.2010,18,701−704.. [百度学术]
Hou,X.;Cheng,Y.;Zhang,P.;Jin,G.Olefinpolymerizationbehaviorofthecyclopentadienylcobaltcomplexesbearingpendantsulfuroroxygenligands.Inorg. Chem. Commun.2006,9,423−425.. [百度学术]
Small,B.L.;Rios,R.;Fernandez,E.R.;Gerlach,D.L.;Halfen,J.A.;Carney,M.J.Oligomerizationofethyleneusingnewtridentateironcatalystsbearingα-diimineligandswithpendantSandPdonors.Organometallics2010,29,6723−6731.. [百度学术]
Small,B.L.;Rios,R.;Fernandez,E.R.;Carney,M.J.Oligomerizationofethyleneusingnewironcatalystsbearingpendantdonormodifiedα-diimineligands.Organometallics2007,26,1744−1749.. [百度学术]
Wallenhorst,C.;Kehr,G.;Luftmann,H.;Fröhlich,R.;Erker,G.Bis(iminoethyl)pyridinesystemswithapendantalkenylgroup.PartA:cobaltandironcomplexesandtheircatalyticbehavior.Organometallics2008,27,6547−6556.. [百度学术]
Weng,Z.;Teo,S.;Hor,A.Chromium(III)catalysedethylenetetramerizationpromotedbybis(phosphino)amineswithanN-functionalizedpendant.Dalton Trans.2007,3493−3498.. [百度学术]
Son,K.;Jöge,F.;Waymouth,R.M.Copolymerizationofstyreneandethyleneathightemperaturewithtitanocenescontainingapendantaminedonor.Maromolecules2008,41,9663−9668.. [百度学术]
Elkin,T.;Botoshansky,M.;Waymouth,R.M.;Eisen,M.Titaniumbis(amidinates)bearingelectrondonatingpendantarmsascatalystsforstereospecificpolymerizationofpropylene.Organometallics2014,33,840−843.. [百度学术]
Homden,D.;Redshaw,C.;Wright,J.A.;Hughes,D.L.;Elsegood,M.R.J.EarlytransitionmetalcomplexesbearingaC-cappedtris(phenolate)ligandincorporatingapendantiminearm:synthesis,structure,andethylenepolymerizationbehavior.Inorg. Chem.2008,47,5799−5814.. [百度学术]
Suttil,J.A.;McGuinness,D.S.;Evans,S.J.ArenesubstitutedcyclopentadienylcomplexesofZrandHf:preparationandevaluationascatalystsforethylenetrimerization.Dalton Trans.2010,39,5278−5285.. [百度学术]
Li,A.;Xiao,W.;Ma,H.;Huang,J.Ethylenepolymerizationwithlong-lifetimemonopendantthienyl-substitutedgroup4metallocenes.Appl. Organomet. Chem.2014,28,495−503.. [百度学术]
Licht,A.I.;Alt,H.G.Synthesisofnovelmetallacycliczirconocenecomplexesfromω-alkenyl-functionalizedzirconocenedichloridecomplexesandtheiruseintheα-olefinpolymerization.J. Organomet. Chem.2002,648,134−148.. [百度学术]
Ceballos-Torres,J.;Gómez-Ruiz,S.;Fajardo,M.;Ana,B.;Pinar,A.B.PrasharS.Synthesisandcharacterizationofalkenylandalkylsubstitutedgroup4metallocenedichloridecomplexes:Applicationsinethylenepolymerization.J. Organomet. Chem.2019,899,120890.. [百度学术]
Lamač,M.;Horáček,M.;Kubišta,J.;Pinkas,J.Intramolecularactivationofpendantalkenylgroupasatoolformodificationofthezirconoceneframework.Inorg. Chim. Acta2011,373,291−294.. [百度学术]
vanderZeijden,A.A.H.;Mattheis,C.Titanocenesandzirconoceneswith(chiral)O-functionalizedsidechainsontheCpring.J. Organomet. Chem.1998,555,5.. [百度学术]
Kirillov,E.;Marquet,N.;Razavi,A.;Belia,V.;Hampel,F.Roisnel,T.;Gladysz,J.A.;Carpentier,J.F.NewC1-symmetricPh2C-bridgedmultisubstitutedansa-zirconocenesforhighlyisospecificpropylenepolymerization:syntheticapproachviaactivatedfulvenes.Organometallics2010,29,5073−5082.. [百度学术]
Zhang,L.;Zhang,B.;Ma,H.Ethylene-bridgedindenyl-fluorenylmetallocenecomplexesforefficientpreparationofallyl-terminatedpropyleneoligomersandpolymersviaselectivemethyltransfer.Chinese J. Polym. Sci.2019,37,578−590.. [百度学术]
Miller,S.A.;Bercaw,J.E.Highlystereoregularsyndiotacticpolypropyleneformationwithmetallocenecatalystsviainfluenceofdistalligandsubstituents.Organometallics,2004,23,1777−1789.. [百度学术]
Huang,W.;Wang,Y.;Ma,H.;Huang,J.HighlyselectivepropylenedimerizationcatalyzedbyC1-symmetriczirconocenecomplexes.Appl. Organomet. Chem.2014,6,413−423.. [百度学术]
170
浏览量
55
下载量
0
CSCD
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构